Enter the organizer password to open the analysis of the baseline self-assessments submitted by confirmed registrations.
How much of the confirmed cohort has submitted the assessment, and when those registrations came in. Everything further down describes the submitted set only.
Confirmed places, assessments received, and the mean baseline confidence of each course. Mean confidence is comparable within a course only — every course rates its own six procedures.
Experience and seniority of the participants behind the ratings, and where they are coming from.
Mean of all six ratings per participant, grouped by the experience band they selected. Shows whether the cohort's seniority actually tracks its self-rated readiness.
What participants wrote in their own words, plus the words they used most often across the cohort. Common words carry no clinical weight on their own — read them as a pointer into the verbatim answers below.
Coaching priority is derived from the mean rating of each procedure: Foundational below 2.0, Build from 2.0 to under 3.0, Reinforce from 3.0 up. “Needs coaching” counts answers of 1 or 2; “Confident” counts answers of 4 or 5. Every mean here counts every baseline rating given. Figures refresh every time this page is loaded.